Conference on College Composition and Communication Logo

Explore the CCCC Exhibit Hall

Visit the Exhibit Hall at the CCCC Convention for the latest in composition materials and services!

Exhibit Hall Hours

Thursday, March 16: 10 a.m. – 6 p.m.
Friday, March 17: 9 a.m. -5 p.m.
Saturday, March 18: 10 a.m. -1 p.m.

2017 Exhibitors Include:

Exhibit Hall

Broadview Press
CCCC Editors
Cengage
Council of Writing Program Administrators
Fountainhead Press
HarperCollins Publishers
Hawkes Learning
International Writing Centers Association
Journal of Teaching Writing
Kendall Hunt Publishing Company
Macmillan Trade
Macmillan Learning
Modern Language Association
Nearpod
Parlor Press and Clemson University
Pearson
Penguin Random House
PM Press
ProctorU
Rhetoric & Composition Journal Editors
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
Southern Illinois University Press
Twenty Six Design LLC
Two-Year College English Association of NCTE
University of Pittsburgh Press
University Press of Colorado, Including Utah State University Press
W.W. Norton
   

   

Exhibitors: Click here for information about exhibiting at the CCCC Convention.

Committee on Undergraduate Research

 

Committee Charge

Committee Members

Jessie Moore, Co-Chair
Michael Neal, Co-Chair
Dominic DelliCarpini
Abby Dubisar
Michelle Grue
Tina Iemma
Shurli Makmillen
John Pruitt
Michael Rifenburg
Sarah Singer

Committee on Undergraduate Research

General Charge: The Committee on Undergraduate Research sponsors activities and initiatives related to undergraduate research in rhetoric, composition, and writing studies.

Responsibilities

  • Organizes the Undergraduate Research (UR) Poster Session at the CCCC Annual Convention and provides various forms of support for undergraduates attending the Convention.
  • Maintains and updates the CCCC Position Statement on Undergraduate Research with attention to current research and data.
  • Consults with other professional organizations and related fields engaged in undergraduate research.

Membership

  • Members will serve three-year terms.
  • Chair: Selects members in consultation with administrative committee chairs and is responsible for fulfilling or delegating its charges.
  • Members: Assist Chair in fulfilling the responsibilities of its charges.

Update

The Committee on Undergraduate Research is charged with fostering the culture of undergraduate research (UR) in writing on behalf of NCTE/CCCC. Established in 2011, this Special Committee operates from the idea that UR benefits not only the students and teachers who work together in different forms of collaborative inquiry but also the programs and departments, institutions, and disciplines that support undergraduate writing researchers, their mentors, and their work. The CCCC Position Statement on Undergraduate Research in Writing Studies and Bibliography further articulates these ideas. The committee also sponsors activities and initiatives affiliated with the CCCC annual convention, including regular data collection and active support for the CCCC Undergraduate Research Poster Session.

Get Connected: The CCCC Connected Community

Your CCCC Membership now includes access to the new CCCC Connected Community – an online interactive website designed to assist our members in their own professional goals.  The CCCC Connected Community is resource for all NCTE and CCCC Members that allows you to interact, share resources, and network with other members.  It allows you to:

Read
  • CCC Online Issues – read, contribute, and interact. 
  • Interactive web content from Studies in Writing and Rhetoric Series, CCC, and FORUM
Interact
  • Robust profiles that allow members to search for others based on research interests, geographical location, university type, and much more
  • Discussion groups on a variety of topics of interest to CCCC members including teaching, research, technology, support for faculty writers, rhetoric, and more
  • Member-created public or private discussion groups (can be used for classes, research teams, and committees)
  • Public and private blogs
  • File sharing library and resources
  •  Mobile phone access so that you can access the Connected Community from anywhere
Attend 
  • CCCC Talk: Extending conversations beyond our Annual Conference 
  • Online initiatives surrounding our Annual Conference

 

Questions? Ideas? Please contact CCCC Memberweb Editor Dana Lynn Driscoll at driscoll@oakland.edu

Learn more about the CCCC Connected Community in this 1.5 minute video…
Learn more about the CCCC Connected Community in this 4.5 minute video…

Getting Started

To make full use of the Connected Community, log in using your NCTE username and password. If this is your first visit, please go to the “My Profile” tab on the top/left side of the page and take a few minutes to complete the “My Privacy Settings” and “My Profile” features. By doing so, you’ll be able to adjust how much information you share with others and you’ll be able to easily identify and network with others who share your professional interests or circumstances.

Your Communities

Next, take some time to just scan the site. You’ll find that you are already subscribed to the “NCTE Members Open Forum” — a collective discussion list and resource archive for all members.

If you serve in a governance or committee role for the Council, you should also be pre-subscribed to communities set up for these groups.

But, depending on your interests, you may elect to join any of the topically-focused communities or may elect to start your own. Just go to the “My Profile” tab and click on the “My Communities” link in the drop down menu that appears. You can use the search function there to look for a particular online community; you can scroll down to see all the communities already available to you; or you can click on the “Create a New Community” link to set up your own group. You’ll note that each community has both an “eGroup” discussion list and a “Library” for shared resources.

Features

There are many other useful elements of your Connected Community to explore — the member directory, member blogs, shared teaching resources, discussion of timely news stories, member accomplishments, even a glossary of literacy terms. For tips in navigating the site, take some time to click on the “helpful hints” video clips or follow the step-by-step instructions. Thanks for taking the time to explore the Connected Community and making it your place to share and grow professionally.

Resources for Women in Community Colleges and Adjuncts in Community Colleges

Books and Articles

Clark, Sandra L. “Women Faculty in Community Colleges: Investigating the Mystery.”
Community College Review, Vol. 26, 1998.
Note: “The author reviews recent literature on women faculty in higher education and in two-year institutions specifically.”

Dugger, K. “Women in Higher Education in the United States: I. Has There Been Much
Progress?
” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 21, 2001.  
Note: Because of economics, community colleges rely more heavily on adjunct and non-tenured faculty.

FORUM: Newsletter for issues about part-time and contingent faculty is a newsletter on
contingent, adjunct, and part-time faculty issues in college composition and communication. This newsletter is published twice annually (alternately in CCC and TETYC) and is sponsored by the Conference on College Composition and Communication.

Gahn, Sandra and Susan B. Twombly. “Dimensions of the Community College Faculty
Labor Market.
”  The Review of Higher Education. Vol. 24, Spring 2001.
Note: Looks at student and faculty demographics.

Hendrix, Katherine Grace. Ed. Neither White Nor Male: Female Faculty of Color. New
Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 110. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2007.  Reviewed by Sharon L. Holmes. The Review of Higher Education 31.3 (2009) 367-68.

Jaschik, Scott. “The Adjunctification of English.” Inside Higher Ed. 11 12 2008. 
Note: Provides highlights of MLA’s “Education in the Balance: A Report on the Academic Workforce in English.” Part-time faculty make up 68% of English teachers in two-year institutions; 40% of English teachers at four-year institutions. Site allows for comments.

Jaschik, Scott. “Evaluating the Adjunct Impact.” Inside Higher Ed. 6 11 2008.
Note: Provides review of studies presented at the Association for the Study of Higher Education and includes studies on community colleges—including impact on transfer. Site allows for comments.

Jaschik, Scott. “The Teaching Paradox.” Inside Higher Ed. 29 12 2008.
Note: Provides highlights of the MLA “associate Professor survey,” focusing on gender differences. Acknowledges low response rate from two-year colleges. Site allows for comments.

Outcalt, Charles. Ed. Community College Faculty: Characteristics, Practices, and
Challenges: New Directions for Community Colleges
. No. 118. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass, August 2002.
Note: The volume examines the practices and attitudes of particular groups of instructors, including part-timers, female faculty, and faculty of color.

Wolf-Wendel, Lisa, Kelly Ward, Susan Twombly. “Faculty Life at Community Colleges:
The Perspectives of Women With Children
.” Community College Review Vol. 34, 2007.

Organizations

American Association of for Women in Community Colleges. Divided into 10 geographic regions.

Blogs

Tips on Getting a Community College Presidency.” Women in Higher Education 2009.

Inside Higher Education, while it covers a variety of issues in academe, the allows for commenting—blog like—in response to articles. In addition, the site is easily searchable by subject matter.

Measuring Institutional Service Project

Resources

Project Handout (PDF)
    
Google Doc Form  

 The CCCC Committee on the Status of Women in the Profession invites you to participate in a “crowd-sourcing” project focused on documenting, mapping, and measuring institutional service. Michelle Masse and Katie Hogan have explored questions about gendered service in their book Over Ten Million Served: Gendered Service in Language and Literature Workplaces, and our committee is interested in creating a database or clearinghouse that would begin to develop a “map” of service responsibilities in different kinds of institutions, position types, and work environments. 

Like the exciting Adjunct Project, we hope to build from the wide range of faculty experiences across higher education to gain accurate knowledge about what constitutes service, how it is compensated, and how it is rewarded. Please add information about your experiences with instiutitonal service to this Google Doc form. If you wish to ensure that your contribution is anonymous, please be sure to log out of your Google account before you add any information. (Your addition need not be anonymous, though.) You do not need to have a Google account in order to make a contribution; you only need the link.

We imagine that this data will be useful to institutions and individual instructors who are developing policies at their home campuses, who are evaluating their own service workloads, and who participate in retention, tenure, and promotion decisions at their institutions. A firmer grasp of how service is counted, compensated, and performed will assist our profession with a possible position statement or policy recommendations on service in rhetoric and composition.

We appreciate your voluntary participation in this project. Before your workload gets too heavy, and for our committee to assess its efforts, please make your contribution by September 20, 2013.

Please also feel free to share the link with interested others. 

If you have questions, please contact Holly Hassel or Hyoejin Yoon, co-chairs of the CCCC Committee on the Status of Women in the Profession.

Useful introductory volumes that address feminist composition studies/gender and professional status issues

Ballif, Michelle, D. Diane Davis, Roxanne Mountford.  Women’s Ways of Making It in Rhetoric and Composition.  Routledge, 2008. 

Enos, Theresa.  Gender Roles and Faculty Lives in Rhetoric and Composition.  Southern Illinois University Press. Place of Publication: Carbondale, IL: 1996.

Jarratt, Susan C.  and Lynn Worsham.  Feminism and Composition:  In Other Words.  Modern Language Association of America, 1998

Kirsch, Gesa, Faye Spencer Maor, Lee Nickoson-Massey, Lance Massey, Mary P. Sheridan-Rabideau.  Feminism and composition: a critical sourcebook.  Macmillan, 2003. 

Schell, Eileen E.  Gypsy Academics and Mother-teachers:  Gender, Contingent Labor, and Writing Instruction.  Heinemann, 1997.

Committee on Part-time, Adjunct or Contingent Labor (March 2015)

Committee Charge

Committee Members

Seth Kahn, Co-Chair
Maria Maisto, Co-Chair
Evelyn Beck
Sue Doe
Tracy Donhardt
Vandana Gavaskar
Dayna Goldstein
Robert Samuels
Danielle Wetzel

This committee is charged to:

  1. Survey the CCCC members who have contingent employment about their working conditions, teaching conditions, and needs.
  2. Identify campuses where there has been improvement in the professional working conditions and conditions of instruction and identify the conditions and processes that led to such improvement.   Disseminate that information the to the membership through FORUM, the CCCC website, or similar venue to aid local strategic action and develop larger strategies.
  3. Identify other professional academic organizations that have substantial interest in issues of part-time, adjunct, or contingent labor. Determine what actions they have engaged in.  Identify potential allies to work with in addressing these issues and in conjunction with the NCTE office approach these organizations to pursue alliances.
  4. Report findings twice yearly to the CCCC Executive Committee.

March 2015 Update

The Committee on Part-Time, Adjunct, or Contingent Labor is currently collecting information on departmental/program needs, and on successful efforts on behalf of contingent faculty equity; the committee is also working with disciplinary and professional associations to build contingent faculty advocacy networks within and across the academy.

Committee on the Major in Writing and Rhetoric (March 2016)

Committee Members

Sandra Jamieson, Chair
Stuart Blythe
Dominic DelliCarpini
Greg Giberson
Teresa Henning
Barbara L’Eplattenier
Barry Maid
Keith Miller
Tom Miller
Blake Scott
Sanford Tweedie
Anne Zanzucchi

Committee Charge

This committee should:

 

Charge 1:  Document the variety of writing majors across the country in diverse institutional types and in diverse units, working with NCTE staff to incorporate/add data into its database.

Charge 2:  Identify and describe a common set of learning outcomes for writing majors.

Charge 3: Identify and describe specific courses/curricula that may be adapted to other majors.

Charge 4:  Track what writing majors do after graduation and report these findings to the CCCC officers and EC and membership in various venues.

Writing Majors at a Glance

These listings of writing majors including the institution, department/program, and core classes and required electives compiled by the CCCC Committee on the Major in Writing and Rhetoric.

2015 Listing

2009 Listing

Spring 2016 Update

The number of majors in writing and rhetoric has doubled in the last decade, and in Fall 2015 the Committee completed an updated list of 141 majors. We have also compiled a bibliography of sources for those interested in the writing major, which we will update each year along with the list of majors. Using this list and local studies we are currently researching commonalities across majors at the curricular and institutional level, and beginning to track career outcomes of students who graduate with writing majors. We are also working on an updated database of writing studies majors, beginning with a survey of program chairs and directors. If you have a writing studies major and do not see your name on this list, please email sjamieson@drew.edu and you will be added to the list and sent a survey. If you are developing a major we would love to hear from you, too.

Contact information for Scott Warnock

Name: Scott Warnock
Title: Associate Professor of English
Director of the Writing Center and Writing Across the Curriculum
Co-Chair, CCCC Committee on Best Practices for Online Writing Instruction
Institution: Drexel University
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Phone: 215.895.0377
Email: sjwarnock@drexel.edu
Skype: scott.warnock2
Website: onlinewritingteacher.blogspot.com

Understanding Fair Use in the Classroom: A Resource

Educators need to consider the concept of fair use as they prepare lessons and assignments that draw on outside materials—audio, visual, or print—that are likely to be copyright protected. At the same time, they must guide their students’ fair use of such materials within the context of twenty-first century participatory culture. One organization that tries to provide guidance to educators as they confront fair use issues is the Center for Social Media, an institute sponsored by the School of Communication at American University. Among the resources the Center provides is a web page with links to codes of best practices developed by professional and scholarly associations whose members are especially likely to confront fair use issues. One link on this web page takes the reader to a document entitled The Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for Media Literacy Education. In this month’s report, I summarize this distillation of the principles governing fair use in the classroom.

 

The NCTE has endorsed this Code, as has the Action Coalition for Media Education, the Media Education Foundation, the National Association for Media Literacy Education, and the Visual Communication Studies Division of the International Communication Association.

 

The Code defines fair use as “the right to use copyrighted material without permission or payment under some circumstances—especially when the cultural or social benefits of the use are predominant.” The cultural or social benefit the Code addresses is media literacy education. The goal of such education is to help students develop the ability to analyze and evaluate and create messages transmitted via various media and embedded within diverse contexts. As such, media literacy education represents an expanded concept of literacy that “responds to the demands of cultural participation in the twenty-first century.”

 

At the core of the document are five principles of fair use specifically framed to address the objective of comprehensive media literacy. The first of these principles addresses the fact that educators will necessarily use copyrighted material in order to help their students develop as communicators and critical thinkers. In response to this reality, the Code’s authors state that fair use permits educators to select “illustrative material from the full range of copyrighted sources” and that this illustrative material may be furnished to students in a number of settings, both formal and informal, physical and virtual. Attached to this principle are certain caveats: Material should be relevant to the lesson or assignment; the length of the material should not exceed that which is necessary to accomplish the assignment’s goals; attribution to the material should be provided; and access should be limited to the students completing the lesson or assignment. These caveats or similar ones apply to the remaining four principles.

 

Analogous to the first principle, the second states that fair use permits teachers to use copyrighted materials in the course of creating lesson plans and other curricular materials, such as workbooks, podcasts, and compilations of video clips. The third principle follows from this second one: fair use permits educators to share these curricular materials with other educators, whether at conferences or at professional development programs or through electronic dissemination.  If the use is genuinely fair use—relevant illustrative material of an appropriate length—the material may even be distributed commercially.  

 

The fourth principle addresses the use that students may make of copyrighted materials. Students will analyze and evaluate messages and will create messages not only out of words but also out of images, sounds, and music, whether in traditional or digital forms. In furtherance of these goals, fair use allows students to “incorporate, modify, and re-present existing media objects in their own classroom work.” Like their teachers, however, students may not make unrestricted use of copyrighted materials. Such material must be repurposed or transformed so that it is being used creatively in order to accomplish a valid educational objective.

 

The fifth principle addresses the circumstances under which students may disseminate their creations via a medium such as the internet. As in the case of the fourth principle, key to the question of fair use is the degree of creativity demonstrated by the student: “student work that incorporates, modifies, and re-presents existing media content” may be considered transformative; if so, fair use allows its distribution to an audience beyond the classroom.

 

In addition to developing and illustrating the above principles, the Code addresses some common myths that may cause educators to shy away both from making fair use of copyrighted material and from encouraging their students to do likewise. In sum, the Code pulls together information that educators may find useful as they attempt to navigate the law of copyright and the needs of their students.

 

Other Fair Use Codes accessible via the website of the Center for Social Media:

Later this fall, please watch for another report on the Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for Scholarly Research in Communication.

 

Submitted by

Kim D. Gainer

Department of English

Radford University

Intellectual Property Reports Main Page

Renew Your Membership

Join CCCC today!
Learn more about the SWR book series.
Connect with CCCC
CCCC on Facebook
CCCC on LinkedIn
CCCC on Twitter
CCCC on Tumblr
OWI Principles Statement
Join the OWI discussion

Copyright

Copyright © 1998 - 2025 National Council of Teachers of English. All rights reserved in all media.

1111 W. Kenyon Road, Urbana, Illinois 61801-1096 Phone: 217-328-3870 or 877-369-6283

Looking for information? Browse our FAQs, tour our sitemap and store sitemap, or contact NCTE

Read our Privacy Policy Statement and Links Policy. Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Use