Conference on College Composition and Communication Logo

College Composition and Communication, Vol. 53, No. 1, September 2001

Click here to view the individual articles in this issue at http://www.ncte.org/cccc/ccc/issues/v53-1

Nicotra, Jodie. Rev. of Spurious Coin: A History of Science, Management, and Technical Writing by Bernadette Longo. CCC. 53.1 (2001): 164-167.

Herndl, Carl G. Rev. of Writing Workplace Cultures: An Archaeology of Professional Writing by Jim Henry. CCC. 53.1 (2001): 167-170.

Prendergast, Catherine. Rev. of Brown v. Board of Education: A Civil Rights Milestone and Its Troubled Legacy by James T. Patterson. CCC. 53.1 (2001): 170-173.

Sledd, James; Susan Naomi Bernstein, Ann E. Green, and Cecilia Ready; Joseph Harris; Michael Murphy. “Interchanges: Responses to ‘New Faculty for a New University’ and to ‘Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss.'” CCC. 53.1 (2001): 146-163.

Davis, D. Diane. “Finitude’s Clamor: Or, Notes toward a Communitarian Literacy.” CCC. 53.1 (2001): 119-145.

Abstract:

To the extent that rhetoric and writing studies bases its theories and pedagogies on the self-present composing subject: the figure of the writer who exists apart from the writing context, from the “world,” from others: it is anti-communitarian. Communication can take place only among beings who are given over to the “outside,” exposed, open to the other’s effraction. This essay therefore calls for the elaboration of a “communitarian” literacy that understands reading and writing as functions of this originary sociality, as expositions not of who one is (identity) but of the fact that “we” are (community).

Keywords:

ccc53.1 TKent Writing Finitude JLNancy Meaning ARonell Paralogic Conversation Community Identity Sociality Myth Interpretation Rhetoric Literacy

Works Cited

Agamben, Giorgio. The Coming Community . Trans. Michael Hardt. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1993.
Ballif, Michelle. “Seducing Composition: A Challenge to Identity-Disclosing Pedagogies.” Rhetoric Review 16 (1997): 76-91.
—. “What Is It That the Audience Wants? Or, Notes Toward a Listening with a Transgendered Ear for (Mis)Understanding.” JAC 19 (1999): 51-70.
—. “Writing the Third-Sophistic Cyborg: Periphrasis on an [In]Tense Rhetoric.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 28 (1998): 51-72.
Barthes, Roland. “To Write: An Intransitive Verb?” The Rustle of Language. Trans. Richard Howard. New York: Hill and Wang, 1986. 11-21.
Berlin, James. “Rhetoric and Ideology in the Writing Class.” College English 50 (1988): 477-94.
Bizzell, Patricia. “The Prospect of Rhetorical Agency.” Making and Unmaking the Prospects for Rhetoric . Ed. Theresa Enos and Richard McNabb. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1997. 37-42.
Blanchot, Maurice. The Unavowable Community . Trans. Pierre Joris. Barrytown, NY: Station Hill, 1988.
Cixous, H�lène. Three Steps on the Ladder of Writing . Trans. Sarah Cornell and Susan Sellers. New York: Columbia UP, 1993.
Cixous, H�lène, and Mireille Calle-Gruber. Rootprints: Memory and Life Writing. Trans. Eric Prenowitz. New York: Routledge, 1997.
Clifford, John. “The Subject of Discourse.” Contending With Words: Composition and Rhetoric in a Postmodern Age . Ed. Patricia Harkin and John Schilb. New York: MLA, 1991. 38-51.
Crowley, Sharon. Composition in the University: Historical and Polemical Essays . Pittsburgh: U of Pittsburgh P, 1998.
Culler, Jonathan. Flaubert: The Uses of Uncertainty . Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1974.
Davis, D. Diane. ” ‘Addicted to Love’; Or, Toward an Inessential Solidarity.” JAC 19 (1999): 633-56.
Deleuze, Gilles. Negotiations .Trans. Martin Joughlin. New York: Columbia UP, 1995.
Deleuze, Gilles, and Felix Guattari. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Trans. Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1987.
Deleuze, Gilles, and Claire Parnet. Dialogues. Trans. Hugh Tomlinson and Barbara Habberjam. New York: Columbia UP, 1987.
Derrida, Jacques. The Ear of the Other: Otobiography, Transference, Translation. Trans. Peggy Kamuf and Avital Ronell. Ed. Christie McDonald. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1988.
—. The Post Card: From Socrates to Freud and Beyond . Trans. Alan Bass. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1987.
—. “A Word of Welcome.” Adieu to Emmanuel Levinas . Stanford: Stanford UP, 1999.
Dobrin, Sid. “Paralogic Hermeneutic Theories, Power, and the Possibility for Liberating Pedagogies.” Kent, Beyond 132-48.
Faigley, Lester. “Competing Theories of Process: A Critique and a Proposal.” College English 48 (1986): 527-42.
Jarratt, Susan. “In Excess: Radical Extentions of Neopragmatism.” Rhetoric, Sophistry, Pragmatism. Ed. Steven Mailloux. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1995. 206-27.
Jarratt, Susan, and Nedra Reynolds. “The Splitting Image: Contemporary Feminisms and the Ethics of êthos .” Ethos: New Essays in Rhetorical and Critical Theory. Ed. James S. and Tita French Baumlin. Dallas: Southern Methodist UP, 1994. 37-63.
Kent, Thomas, ed. Beyond the Writing Process Paradigm: Post-Process Theory . Carbondale, Southern Illinois UP, 1999.
—. “Paralogic Hermeneutics and the Possibilities of Rhetoric.” Rhetoric Review 8 (1989): 24-42.
—. Paralogic Rhetoric: A Theory of Communicative Interaction . London: Bucknell UP, 1993.
Levinas, Emmanuel. Otherwise Than Being or Beyond Essence . Trans. Alphonso Lingis. Pittsburgh, Duquesne UP, 1998.
—. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority . Trans. Alphonso Lingis. Pittsburgh: Duquesne UP, 1969.
—. “The Trace of the Other.” Trans. Alphonso Lingis. Deconstruction in Context. Ed. Mark C. Taylor. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1986. 345-59.
Lyotard, Jean-François. “Answering the Question: What is Postmodernism?” Postmodern Condition, 71-82.
—. The Inhuman: Reflections on Time . Trans. Geoffrey Bennington and Rachel Bowlby. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1991.
—. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge . Trans. Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1984.
—. “Resisting a Discourse of Mastery: A Conversation with Jean-François Lyotard.” Interview with Gary Olson. JAC 15 (1995): 391-410.
Mailloux, Steven. Reception Histories: Rhetoric, Pragmatism, and American Cultural Politics . Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1998.
Nancy, Jean-Luc. The Birth To Presence . Trans. Brian Holmes, et al. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1993.
—. The Experience of Freedom . Trans. Bridget McDonald. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1993.
—. “Exscription.” Birth To Presence 319-40.
—. The Inoperative Community . Ed. Peter Connor. Trans. Peter Connor, Lisa Garbus, Michael Holland, and Simona Sawhney. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1991.
—. The Sense of the World. Trans. Jeffrey S. Librett. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1997.
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Beyond Good and Evil. 1886. Trans. R. J. Hollingdale. New York: Viking, 1972.
—. Will To Power. Trans. Walter Kaufmann and R. J. Hollingdale. New York: Vintage, 1968.
Olson, Gary. “Toward a Post-Process Composition: Abandoning the Rhetoric of Assertion.” Kent, Beyond 7-15.
Ratcliffe, Krista. ” Rhetorical Listening: A Trope for Interpretive Invention and a ‘Code of Cross-Cultural Conduct .'”College Composition and Communication 51 (1999): 195-224.
Ronell, Avital. “Confessions of an Anacoluthon: Avital Ronell on Writing, Technology, Pedagogy, Politics.” Interview with D. Diane Davis. JAC 20 (2000): 243-81.
—. Crack Wars: Literature, Addiction, Mania . Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1992.
—. Dictations: On Haunted Writing . Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1993.
—. Finitude’s Score: Essays for the End of the Millennium. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1994.
—. Stupidity. Champaign: U of Illinois P, in press.
—. The Telephone Book: Technology, Schizophrenia, Electric Speech . Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1989.
Vitanza, Victor. “Critical Sub/Versions of the History of Philosophical Rhetoric.” Rhetoric Review 6 (1987): 41-66.
—. Negation, Subjectivity, and the History of Rhetoric . New York: SUNY P, 1997.

Eubanks, Philip. “Understanding Metaphors for Writing: In Defense of the Conduit Metaphor.” CCC. 53.1 (2001): 92-118.

Abstract:

The Conduit Metaphor has been roundly condemned by language scholars, including scholars in rhetoric and composition, but it is time to reevaluate its import and value. Rather than simply asserting a mistaken view of linguistic communication, the Conduit Metaphor combines with the metaphor Language Is Power to form a prudentially applied ethical measure of discourses, genres, and texts.

Keywords:

ccc53.1 Metaphor Language Writing Conduit Meaning Communication Power War Argument GLakoff ConceptualMetaphors

Works Cited

Barabas, Christine. “Uncovering the CYA (“Cover-Your-Ass”) Phenomenon in Organizational Writing: Initial Findings.” Technical Communication 40 (1993): 344-48.
Bizzell, Patricia. “Cognition, Convention, and Certainty: What We Need To Know About Writing.” Pre/Text 3 (1982): 213-43.
Burke, Kenneth. A Rhetoric of Motives . Berkeley: U of California P, 1969.
Clark, Gregory. ” Writing as Travel, or Rhetoric on the Road .” College Composition and Communication 49 (1998): 9-23.
Cooper, Marilyn M. “The Postmodern Space of Operator’s Manuals .” Technical Communication Quarterly 5 (1996): 385-410.
Crosswhite, James. The Rhetoric of Reason: Writing and the Attractions of Argument. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1996.
de Man, Paul. “The Epistemology of Metaphor.” On Metaphor. Ed. Sheldon Sacks. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1979. 11-28.
Dobrin, David. Writing and Technique . Urbana: NCTE, 1989.
Elbow, Peter. Writing with Power: Techniques for Mastering the Writing Process . New York: Oxford UP, 1981.
Eubanks, Philip. A War of Words in the Discourse of Trade: The Rhetorical Constitution of Metaphor . Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 2000.
Gee, James Paul. Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses . London: Falmer, 1990.
Gibbs, Raymond. The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding . Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1994.
—. “Speaking and Thinking with Metonymy.” Metonymy in Language and Thought. Ed. Klaus-Uwe Panther and Günter Radden. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1999. 61-76.
Goossens, Louis. “Metaphtonymy: The Interaction of Metaphor and Metonymy in Figurative Expressions for Linguistic Action.” By Word of Mouth: Metaphor, Metonymy and Linguistic Action in a Cognitive Perspective. Ed. Louis Goossens, Paul Pauwels, Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn, Anne-Marie Simon- Vandenbergen, and Johan Vanparys. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1995. 159-74.
Grady, Joseph. “The ‘Conduit Metaphor Revisited’: A Reassessment of Metaphors for Communication.” Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap. Ed. J. P. Koenig. Stanford: CSLI, 1998. 205-18.
Hutchins, Edwin. Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge: MIT P, 1995.
Johnson, Mark. Moral Imagination: Implications of Cognitive Science for Ethics. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1993.
Katz, Steven B. “The Ethic of Expediency: Classical Rhetoric, Technology, and the Holocaust.” College English 54 (1992): 255-75.
Keysar, Boaz, and Sam Glucksberg. “Metaphor and Communication.” Poetics Today 13 (1992): 633-58.
Kibbee, Douglas. Review of Language is Power: The Story of Standard English and Its Enemies by John Honey. Journal of Linguistics 34 (1998): 525-30.
Lakoff, George. “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor.” Metaphor and Thought. Ed. Andrew Ortony. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1993. 202-51.
—. Moral Politics: What Conservatives Know That Liberals Don’t . Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1996.
—. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind . Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1987.
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1980.
—. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic, 1999.
Longo, Bernadette. Spurious Coin: A History of Science, Management, and Technical Writing . Albany: SUNY P, 2000.
Markel, Mike. “Ethics and Technical Communication: A Case for Foundational Approaches.” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 40 (1997): 284-98.
Miller, Carolyn. “A Humanistic Rationale for Technical Writing.” College English 40 (1979): 610-17.
Oakley, Todd. “The Human Rhetorical Potential.” Written Communication 16 (1999): 93-128.
Perelman, Chaim. The Realm of Rhetoric . Trans. William Kluback. Notre Dame: U of Notre Dame P, 1982.
Pinker, Stephen. The Language Instinct. New York: Morrow, 1994.
Prior, Paul. Writing/Disciplinarity: A Sociohistoric Account of Literate Activity in the Academy . Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1998.
Radden, Günter, and Zoltán Kövecses. “Towards a Theory of Metonymy.” Metonymy in Language and Thought. Ed. Klaus-Uwe Panther and Günter Radden. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1999. 17-60.
Reddy, Michael. “The Conduit Metaphor: A Case of Frame Conflict in Our Language about Language.” Metaphor and Thought . 1979. Ed. Andrew Ortony. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1993. 164-201.
Rudzka-Ostyn, Brygida. “Semantic Extensions into the Domain of Verbal Communication.” Topics in Cognitive Linguistics . Ed. Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1988. 507-53.
Seitz, James. Motives for Metaphor: Literacy, Curriculum Reform, and the Teaching of English. Pittsburgh: U of Pittsburgh P, 1999.
Smith, Elizabeth Overman. “Intertextual Connections for ‘A Humanistic Rationale for Technical Writing.'” Journal of Business and Technical Communication 11 (1997): 192-222.
Talmy, Leonard. “Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition.” Cognitive Science 12 (1988): 49-100.
Turner, Mark. Death Is the Mother of Beauty: Mind, Metaphor, Criticism. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1987.
—. “Language is a Virus.” Poetics Today 13 (1992): 725-36.
—. Reading Minds: The Study of English in the Age of Cognitive Science . Princeton: Princeton UP, 1991.
VanParys, Johan. “A Survey of Metalinguistic Metaphors.” By Word of Mouth: Metaphor, Metonymy and Linguistic Action in a Cognitive Perspective. Ed. Louis Goossens, Paul Pauwels, Brygida Rudzka- Ostyn, Anne-Marie Simon- Vandenbergen, and Johan Vanparys. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1995. 1-34.
Winsor, Dorothy. “Genre and Activity Systems: The Role of Documentation in Maintaining and Changing Engineering Activity Systems.” Written Communication 16 (1999): 200-24.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations . New York: Macmillan, 1958.

Burton, Vicki Tolar. “John Wesley and the Liberty to Speak: The Rhetorical and Literacy Practices of Early Methodism.” CCC. 53.1 (2001): 65-91.

Abstract:

In early Methodism John Wesley created an extracurricular site of literacy and rhetoric that empowered women and the working classes to read, write, and speak in public. Wesley’s “method” of literacy in community not only transformed religious life in Britain but also redefined the intersections of education, class, and gender.

Keywords:

ccc53.1 JWesley Rhetoric Preaching Literacy Experience Methodism WorkingClass Women Spiritual Community Education

Works Cited

The Arminian Magazine. London: 1778-1796.
Blair, Hugh. Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres . Philadelphia: Kay [c. 1836].
Boswell, James. Boswell: Life of Johnson . Ed. R. W. Chapman. Corrected by J. D. Fleeman. London: Oxford UP, 1970.
Brantley, Richard E. Locke, Wesley, and the Method of English Romanticism . Gainesville: U of Florida P, 1984.
Brown, Earl Kent. Women of Mr. Wesley’s Methodism . New York: Mellen, 1983. Campbell, George. Lectures on Systematic Theology and Pulpit Eloquence . Philadelphia, 1810.
—. The Philosophy of Rhetoric . 1776. Ed. Lloyd F. Bitzer. Rev. ed. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1988.
Chilcote, Paul Wesley. John Wesley and the Women Preachers of Early Methodism . Metuchen, NJ, and Philadelphia: American Theological Library Association and Scarecrow P, 1991.
Collins, Vicki Tolar. “The Speaker Respoken: Material Rhetoric as Feminist Methodology.” College English 61 (1999): 545-73.
—. “Walking in Light, Walking in Darkness: The Story of Women’s Changing Rhetorical Space in Early Methodism.” Rhetoric Review 14 (1996): 336-54.
Davies, Horton. Worship and Theology in England from Watts and Wesley to Mauriec, 1690-1850 . Princeton: Princeton UP, 1961.
Downey, James. The Eighteenth Century Pulpit . Oxford: Clarendon, 1969.
Foucault. Michel. “The Order of Discourse.” Trans. Ian McLeod. Untying the Text : A Post-Structuralist Reader. Ed. Robert Young. Boston: Routledge, 1981.
Gere, Anne Ruggles. ” Kitchen Tables and Rented Rooms: The Extracurriculum of Composition .” College Composition and Communication 45 (1994): 75-92.
Golden, James L. “John Wesley on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres.” Speech Monographs 28 (1961): 250-64.
Golden, James, and Edward P. J. Corbett. The Rhetoric of Blair, Campbell, and Whately. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1990.
Halevy, Elie. The Birth of Methodism in England . Trans. Bernard Semmel. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1971.
Heitzenrater, Richard P. Wesley and the People Called Methodists . Nashville: Abingdon, 1995.
Hempton, David. Methodism and Politics in British Society 1750-1850 . Stanford: Stanford UP, 1984.
Howell, Wilbur Samuel. Eighteenth-Century British Logic and Rhetoric . Princeton: Princeton UP, 1971.
—. Logic and Rhetoric in England, 1500-1700 . Princeton: Princeton UP, 1956.
Lackington, James. The Confessions of J. Lackington, Late Bookseller, at the Temple of the Muses . London: Edwards, 1804.
Laqueur, Thomas W. Religion and Respectability: Sunday Schools and Working Class Culture . New Haven: Yale UP, 1976.
Le Faucheur, Michel. Traite de l’action de l’orateur, ou de la Prononciation et du geste . Paris: Courbe, 1657.
Lessenich, Rolf P. Elements of Pulpit Oratory in Eighteenth-Century England (1660- 1800). Köln: Böhlau-Verlag, 1972.
Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding . Ed. Alexander Campbell Fraser. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon, 1894.
Miller, Thomas P. The Formation of College English: Rhetoric and Belles Lettres in the British Cultural Provinces . Pittsburgh: U of Pittsburgh P, 1997.
Minutes of the Methodist Conferences . Vol. 1 (1744-1798). London: Mason, 1862.
Moore, Henry. The Life of the Rev. John Wesley . 2 vols. London: Kershaw, 1824.
Parker, Irene. Dissenting Academies in England . New York: Octagon, 1969.
Rack, Henry D. Reasonable Enthusiast: John Wesley and the Rise of Methodism . Philadelphia: Trinity, 1989.
Rademaker, C. S. M. The Life and Work of Gerardus Joannes Vossius (1577-1649) . Assen, Neth.: Van Gorcum, 1981.
Rogers, Hester Ann. Account of the Experience of Hester Ann Rogers; and her Funeral Sermon, by Rev. T. Coke LL.D. to which is added Her Spiritual Letters . New York: Mason and Lane, 1837.
Rupp, Gordon. Religion in England 1688- 1791 . Oxford: Clarendon, 1986.
Shepherd, T. B. Methodism and the Literature of the Eighteenth Century . New York: Haskell, 1966.
Sheridan, Thomas. Lectures on Elocution . London, 1762.
Southey, Robert. Life of Wesley: and Rise and Progress of Methodism . London: Longman, 1858.
Thompson, E. P. The Making of the English Working Class . New York: Pantheon, 1963.
Ward, John. A System of Oratory . 2 vols. London, 1759.
Watts, Michael R. The Dissenters . 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon, 1978-95.
Wearmouth, Robert F. Methodism and the Working-Class Movements of England 1800-1850 . London: Epworth, 1937.
Wesley, John. Obituary. The Gentleman’s Magazine Mar. 1791: 283.
—. The Works of John Wesley . Ed. Thomas Jackson. 3rd edition. London, 1831. CD-ROM. Franklin, TN: Providence, 1995.
Whiteley, J. H. Wesley’s England: A Survey of Eighteenth-Century Social and Cultural Conditions . London: Epworth, 1938.

Beason, Larry. “Ethos and Error: How Business People React to Errors.” CCC. 53.1 (2001): 33-64.

Abstract:

Errors seem to bother nonacademic readers as well as teachers. But what does it mean to be “bothered” by errors? Questions such as this help transform the study of error from mere textual issues to larger rhetorical matters of constructing meaning. Although this study of fourteen business people indicates a range of reactions to errors, the findings also reveal patterns of qualitative agreement: certain ways in which these readers constructed a negative ethos of the writer.

Keywords:

ccc53.1 Error Writing Image Readers Reactions ProfessionalWriting Problems Ethos Sentence ErrorGravity

Works Cited

Bartholomae, David. “The Study of Error.” College Composition and Communication 31 (1980): 253-69.
Beason, Larry. “Strategies for Establishing an Effective Persona: An Analysis of Appeals to Ethos in Business Speeches.” Journal of Business Communication 28 (1991): 326-46.
Connatser, Bradford R. “Last Rites for Readability Formulas in Technical Communication.” Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 29 (1999): 271-87.
Connors, Robert. J., and Andrea A. Lunsford. “Frequency of Formal Errors in Current College Writing, or Ma and Pa Kettle Do Research.” College Composition and Communication 39 (1988): 395-409.
Corder, S. P. “The Significance of Learners’ Errors.” International Review of Applied Linguistics 5 (1967): 161-70.
Greenbaum, Sidney, and John Taylor. “The Recognition of Usage Errors by Instructors of Freshman Composition.” College Composition and Communication 32 (1981): 169-74.
Hairston, Maxine. “Not All Errors Are Created Equal: Nonacademic Readers in the Professions Respond to Lapses in Usage.” College English 43 (1981): 794- 806.
Halstead, Isabella. “Putting Error in Its Place.” Journal of Basic Writing 1.1 (1975): 72-86.
Haswell, Richard H. “Minimal Marking.” College English 45 (1983): 600-04.
Kantz, Margaret, and Robert Yates. “Whose Judgments? A Survey of Faculty Responses to Common and Highly Irritating Writing Errors.” Fifth Annual Conference of the NCTE Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar. Normal, IL. 12 Aug. 1994 <http://www2.pct.edu/courses/evavra/ateg/p5n13.htm>.
Kvale, Steinar. Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996.
Lees, Elaine, O. “Proofreading as Reading, Errors as Embarrassments.” A Sourcebook for Basic Writing Teachers . Ed. Theresa Enos. New York: Random, 1987. 216-30.
Leonard, Donald. J., and Jeanette W. Gilsdorf. “Language in Change: Academics’ and Executives’ Perceptions of Usage Errors.” Journal of Business Communication 27 (1990): 137-58.
Long, Russell C. “Error Recognition: Implications for Interdisciplinary Writing Instruction.” 1982. ERIC ED 241 936.
Merriam, Sharan B. Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1991.
Monthei, Carol. “Important Factors That Influence Employers When Screening.” Thesis, Colorado State U, 1989. ERIC ED 334 490.
Tomlinson, Barbara. “Talking About the Composing Process: The Limitations of Retrospective Accounts.” Written Communication 1 (1984): 429-45.
Wall, Susan V., and Glynda A. Hull. “The Semantics of Error: What Do Teachers Know?” Writing and Response: Theory, Practice, and Research . Ed. Chris M. Anson. Urbana: NCTE, 1989. 261-92.
Williams, Joseph M. “The Phenomenology of Error.” College Composition and Communication 32 (1981): 152-68.

Marback, Richard. “Ebonics: Theorizing in Public Our Attitudes toward Literacy.” CCC. 53.1 (2001): 11-32.

Abstract:

I argue that our responses to the Oakland ebonics resolution miss what made the resolution so significant while also making debate about it so intractable. I propose that compositionists who acknowledge attitudes that made the resolution so significant can productively engage the larger public regarding literacy education in a racially divided democracy.

Keywords:

ccc53.1 Ebonics Students Language Attitudes Literacy Resolution AfricanAmerican Teachers Values Practices Policy Race

Works Cited

Ball, Arnetha and Ted Lardner. ” Dispositions toward Language: Teacher Constructs of Knowledge and the Ann Arbor Black English Case .” College Composition and Communication 48 (1997): 469-85.
Brodkey, Linda. “Tropics of Literacy.” Rewriting Literacy: Culture and the Discourse of the Other. Ed. Candace Mitchell and Kathleen Weiler. New York: Bergin & Garvey, 1991. 161-68.
Bruch, Pat, and Richard Marback. “Race Identity, Writing, and the Politics of Dignity: Reinvigorating the Ethics of ‘Students’ Right to Their Own Language.” JAC 17 (1997): 265-81.
CCCC Statement on Ebonics. College Composition and Communication 50 (1999): 524.
Cohen, Richard. “Ebonics, Whatever It Is, Signifies Kids Need Help.” Detroit Free Press 3 Jan. 1997: 11A.
Cosby, Bill. “Elements of Igno-Ebonics Style.” The Wall Street Journal 10 Jan. 1997: A10.
Cose, Ellis. “Why Ebonics is Irrelevant” Newsweek 13 Jan. 1997: 80.
Delpit, Lisa. Other People’s Children: Cultural Conflict in the Classroom . New York: New, 1995.
Farragher, Thomas. “Ebonics May Not Get U.S. Funds, Senator Says.” Detroit Free Press 24 Jan. 1997: 5A.
Fordham, Signithia. Blacked Out: Dilemmas of Race, Identity, and Success at Capital High . Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1996.
Fox, Tom. Defending Access: A Critique of Standards in Higher Education . Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann-Boynton/ Cook, 1999.
Getridge, Carolyn. “Oakland Superintendent Responds to Critics of the Ebonics Policy.” Perry and Delpit 156-59.
Horner, Bruce. “Re-thinking the ‘Sociality’ of Error: Teaching Editing as Negotiation.” Representing the “Other:” Basic Writers and the Teaching of Basic Writing . Ed. Bruce Horner and Min-Zhan Lu. Urbana: NCTE, 1999. 139-65.
Jones, Rachel. “Not White, Just Right.” Newsweek 10 Feb. 1997: 12-13.
Kozol, Jonathan. Death at an Early Age: The Destruction of the Hearts and Minds of Negro Children in the Boston Public Schools . New York: Penguin, 1967.
Mortensen, Peter. ” Going Public .” College Composition and Communication 50 (1998): 182-205.
Nino, Carlos Santiago. The Constitution of Deliberative Democracy . New Haven: Yale UP, 1996.
“The Oakland Ebonics Resolution.” Perry and Delpit 143-45.
Ogbu, John. “Literacy and Schooling in Subordinate Cultures: The Case of Black Americans.” Perspectives on Literacy . Ed. Eugene R. Kintgen, Barry M. Kroll, and Mike Rose. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1988. 227-42.
Perry, Theresa, and Lisa Delpit, ed. The Real Ebonics Debate: Power, Language, and the Education of African-American Children . Boston: Beacon, 1998.
Rowen, Carl. “Ebonics Undermines Black Success” Detroit Free Press 12 Feb. 1997: 15A.
Royster, Jacqueline Jones. “When the First Voice You Hear Is Not Your Own.” College Composition and Communication 47 (1996): 29-40.
Sowell, Thomas. “Oakland’s Ebonics ‘Fraud’ and Effort to Divert Blame” Detroit News 9 Feb. 1997: 7B.
Steinberg, Stephen. “The Liberal Retreat from Race During the Post-Civil Rights Era.” The House That Race Built: Black Americans, U.S. Terrain . Ed. Wahneema Lubiano. New York: Pantheon, 1997. 13-47.
West, Cornel. Race Matters. New York: Vintage, 1994.

Renew Your Membership

Join CCCC today!
Learn more about the SWR book series.
Connect with CCCC
CCCC on Facebook
CCCC on LinkedIn
CCCC on Twitter
CCCC on Tumblr
OWI Principles Statement
Join the OWI discussion

Copyright

Copyright © 1998 - 2024 National Council of Teachers of English. All rights reserved in all media.

1111 W. Kenyon Road, Urbana, Illinois 61801-1096 Phone: 217-328-3870 or 877-369-6283

Looking for information? Browse our FAQs, tour our sitemap and store sitemap, or contact NCTE

Read our Privacy Policy Statement and Links Policy. Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Use