College Composition and Communication, Vol. 54, No. 1, September 2002

Click here to view the individual articles in this issue at http://www.ncte.org/cccc/ccc/issues/v54-1

Braun, Lundy. Rev. of Out of the Dead House: Nineteenth-Century Women Physicians and theWriting of Medicine by Susan Wells. CCC. 54.1 (2002): 143-146.

Islam, Suhail. Rev. of Life-Affirming Acts: Education As Transformation in the Writing Classroom by Hector Julio Vila. CCC. 54.1 (2002): 146-150.

Salvatori, Mariolina Rizzi. Rev. of Activist Rhetorics and American Higher Education: 1885-1937 by Susan Kates. CCC. 54.1 (2002): 150-153.

Martins, David. Rev. of Student Writing: Access, Regulation, Desire by  Theresa M. Lillis. CCC. 54.1 (2002): 153-156.

Pinard, Mary. Rev. of The Politics of Writing Centers. Jane Nelson and Kathy Evertz, eds. CCC. 54.1 (2002): 156-158.

Flynn, Elizabeth A. Rev. of Alternative Rhetorics: Challenges to the Rhetorical Tradition. Laura Gray-Rosendale and Sibylle Gruber, eds. CCC. 54.1 (2002): 158-161.

Rhodes, Jacqueline. “‘Substantive and Feminist Girlie Action’: Women Online.” CCC. 54.1 (2002): 116-142.

Abstract:

Radical feminist textuality of the 1960s and today provides a suggestive example of networked and collectively literate action, action dependent on the constant and visible contextualization of self and writing within the discourses that shape us. In this essay, I argue that an articulation of radical feminist textuality can benefit both scholarship and classroom, in that it situates writers as rhetorical agents who can write, resist, and, finally act within a network of discourses and identifications.

Keywords:

ccc54.1 Women Feminism Online Web Websites Internet Action Network Technology Space Textuality Agency

Works Cited

Brail, Stephanie. “The Price of Admission: Harassment and Free Speech in the Wild, Wild West.” Cherny and Weise 141-57.

Burbules, Nicholas C. “Rhetorics of the Web: Hyperreading and Critical Literacy.” Page to Screen: Taking Literacy into the Electronic Era . Ed. Ilana Snyder. New York: Routledge, 1998. 102-22.

Camp, L. Jean. “We Are Geeks, and We Are Not Guys: The Systers Mailing List.” Cherny and Weise 114-25.

Canadian Women Internet Association (CWIA). 29 Sept. 1999. Home page. 13 Mar. 2002 <http://www.herplace.org/>.

Caughie, Pamela L. “Passing As Pedagogy: Feminism in(to) Cultural Studies.” English Studies/Culture Studies: Institutionalizing Dissent . Ed. Isaiah Smithson and Nancy Ruff. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 1994. 76-93.

Cherny, Lynn, and Elizabeth Reba Weise, eds. Wired Women: Gender and New Realities in Cyberspace . Seattle: Seal, 1996.

Coyle, Karen. “How Hard Can It Be?” Cherny and Weise 42-55.

Cybergrrl. Home page. 10 Mar. 2002 <http://www.cybergrrl.com>.

Cybergrrl, Inc. 2001 “Client Services.” 13 Mar. 2002 <http://www.cgim.com/service.html>.

—. 2000 “Online Entertainment.” 13 Mar. 2002 <http://www.cgim.com/entertain.html>.

Dertouzos, Michael . What Will Be: How the New World of Information Will Change Our Lives . New York: HarperEdge- HarperCollins, 1997.

Eastman, Sheila. Online posting. 10 May 1999. CWIA Guestbook . 14 May 1999 <http://www.women.ca/cgi-bin/signguest.pl?guestfile=women.main&guesttitle=CWIA+Guestbook&mailto=femail@women.ca&mailsubj=CWIA+Guestbook>.

Femina. 2001. “About Femina.” 04 Mar. 2002 <http://femina.cybergrrl.com/about.html>.

Flores, Mary J. “Computer Conferencing: Composing a Feminist Community of Writers.” Handa 106-17.

Freeman, Jo. The Politics of Women’s Liberation: A Case Study of an Emerging Social Movement and Its Relation to the Policy Process . New York: David McKay, 1975.

Gallardo, Susana L. “Chicanas Chingonas.” 25 May 2001. Making Face, Making Soul: A Chicana Feminist Homepage . 28 Feb. 2002 <http://chicanas.com/chingonas.html>.

—. “huh.” Making Face, Making Soul: A Chicana Feminist Homepage . 04 Mar. 2002 <http://chicanas.com/huh.html>.

Giroux, Henry A., and Patrick Shannon. “Cultural Studies and Pedagogy as Performative Practice: Toward an Introduction .” Education and Cultural Studies: Toward a Performative Practice . Ed. Giroux and Shannon. New York: Routledge, 1997. 1-9.

Handa, Carolyn, ed. Computers and Community: Teaching Composition in the Twenty-First Century . Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook-Heinemann, 1990.

Harris, Joseph. A Teaching Subject: Composition Since 1966 . Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 1997.

Hawisher, Gail E., and Cynthia L. Selfe. “Inventing Postmodern Identities: Hybrid and Transgressive Literacy Practices on the Web.” Global Literacies and the World-Wide Web. Ed. Hawisher and Selfe. New York: Routledge, 2000. 277-89.

Hawisher, Gail E., and Patricia Sullivan. “Women on the Networks: Searching for E-Spaces of Their Own.” Jarratt and Worsham 172-97.

Hole, Judith, and Ellen Levine. Rebirth of Feminism. New York: Quadrangle, 1971.

hooks, bell. Outlaw Culture: Resisting Representations. New York: Routledge, 1994.

Jarratt, Susan C., and Lynn Worsham, eds. Feminism and Composition Studies: In Other Words . New York: MLA, 1998.

Johnson-Eilola, Johndan. Nostalgic Angels: Rearticulating Hypertext Writing . Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1997.

—. “Reading and Writing in Hypertext: Vertigo and Euphoria.” Literacy and Computers: The Complications of Teaching and Learning with Technology . Ed. Cynthia L. Selfe and Susan Hilligoss. New York: MLA. 195-219.

LeCourt, Donna, and Luann Barnes. “Writing Multiplicity: Hypertext and Feminist Textual Politics.” Computers and Composition 16.1 (1999): 55-71.

Lorde, Audre. “The Master’s Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master’s House.” Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches by Audre Lorde. Trumansburg, NY: Crossing P, 1984. 110-13.

Lunsford, Andrea A., Helene Moglen, and James Slevin, eds. The Right to Literacy. New York: MLA, 1990.

Miller, Susan. Rescuing the Subject: A Critical Introduction to Rhetoric and the Writer . Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1989.

Morgan, Robin, ed. Sisterhood Is Powerful: An Anthology of Writings from the Women’s Liberation Movement . New York: Random, 1970.

Nguyen, Mimi. Exoticize My Fist! 11 Mar. 2002 <http://members.aol.com/Critchicks>.

—. “Original Statement.” Sept. 1997. Exoticize My Fist! 09 Mar. 2002 <http://members.aol.com/Critchicks/original.html>.

Reynolds, Nedra. “Interrupting Our Way to Agency: Feminist Cultural Studies and Composition.” Jarratt and Worsham 58-73.

Selfe, Cynthia L. “Technology in the English Classroom: Computers through the Lens of Feminist Theory.” Handa 118-39.

“Statement of Purpose.” 2002. Feminista! 4 Jun. 2002 <http://www.feminista.com/>.

Wahlstrom, Billie J. “Communication and Technology: Defining a Feminist Presence in Research and Practice.” Literacy and Computers: The Complications of Teaching and Learning with Technology . Ed. Cynthia L. Selfe and Susan Hilligoss. New York: MLA, 1994. 171-85.

Wench. “About Wench.” 4 Jun. 2002 <http://www.wench.com/about/>.

—. 1996. “Forward.” 12 Sept. 1998 <http://www.wench.com/>.

Price, Margaret. “Beyond ‘Gotcha!’: Situating Plagiarism in Policy and Pedagogy.” CCC. 54.1 (2002): 88-115.

Abstract:

Plagiarism is difficult, if not impossible, to define. In this paper, I argue for a contextsensitive understanding of plagiarism by analyzing a set of written institutional policies and suggesting ways that they might be revised. In closing, I offer examples of classroom practices to help teach a concept of plagiarism as situated in context.

Keywords:

ccc54.1 Plagiarism Students Policy Document RHoward Writing Author Ideas Citation Pedagogy Collaboration

Works Cited

“About Plagiarism.” Document, Writing Program, University of Massachusetts- Amherst, 2002.

“About Plagiarism.” Writing Program, University of Massachusetts-Amherst. 19 January 2002 <http://writingprogram.hfa.umass.edu/firstyear/plagiarism.html/>.

Atkins, Thomas, and Gene Nelson. “Plagiarism and the Internet: Turning the Tables.” English Journal 90 (2001): 101-04.

Bakhtin, M. M. “Discourse in the Novel.” The Dialogic Imagination. Ed. Michael Holquist. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: U of Texas P, 1981. 259-422.

Begoray, Deborah L. “The Borrowers: Issues in Using Previously Composed Text.” English Quarterly 28 (1996): 60-69.

Bloom, Lynn Z. “Freshman Composition As a Middle-Class Enterprise.” College English 58 (1996): 654-75.

Bowden, Darsie. “Stolen Voices: Plagiarism and Authentic Voice.” Composition Studies 24 (1996): 5-18.

Bruffee, Kenneth A. “Collaborative Learning and the ‘Conversation of Mankind.'” College English 46 (1984): 635-52.

Buranen, Lise. “But I Wasn’t Cheating: Plagiarism and Cross-Cultural Mythology.” Buranen and Roy 63-74.

Buranen, Lise, and Alice M. Roy, eds. Perspectives on Plagiarism and Intellectual Property in a Postmodern World. Albany: State U of New York P, 1999.

Cooper, Marilyn M. Letter to the author. 6 December 2001.

Curtis, Marcia, Benjamin Balthaser, Michael Edwards, Zan Goncalves, Robert Hazard, Noria Jablonski, Brian Jordan, and Shauna Seliy. The Original Text-Wrestling Book . Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt, 2001.

Delpit, Lisa D. “The Silenced Dialogue: Power and Pedagogy in Educating Other People’s Children.” Harvard Educational Review 58 (1988): 280-98.

Dowling, Carolyn. “Word Processing and the Ongoing Difficulty of Writing.” Computers and Composition 11 (1994): 227-35.

Ede, Lisa, and Andrea A. Lunsford. “Collaboration and Concepts of Authorship.” PMLA 116 (2001): 354-69.

Fitzsimmons, Anne. “Annotation As an Ethical Practice.” Reflections in Writing 18 (1998). 31 January 2002 <http://wrt.syr.edu/pub/reflections/18/fitzsimmons.html>.

Fox, Helen. Listening to the World: Cultural Issues in Academic Writing. Urbana: NCTE, 1994.

Freire, Paulo. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Trans. Myra Bergman Ramos. New York: Continuum, 1970.

Harris, Joseph. “The Idea of Community in the Study of Writing.” College Composition and Communication 40 (1989): 11-22.

Herrington, Anne. Classroom lecture, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, 5 November 1999.

Howard, Rebecca Moore. “Plagiarisms, Authorships, and the Academic Death Penalty.” College English 57 (1995): 788-806.

—. “Sexuality, Textuality: The Cultural Work of Plagiarism.” College English 62 (2000): 473-91.

—. Standing in the Shadow of Giants: Plagiarists, Authors, Collaborators. Stamford, CT: Ablex, 1999.

Kaufman, Rona. “The Politics of Citation: Owning and Owning-Up-To in the Composition Classroom.” Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, 1999.

Kucich, John. “Plagiarism.” Online memo to students in English Dept., University of Michigan-Ann Arbor. 19 January 2002 <http://www.lsa.umich.edu/english/undergraduate/plag.htm>.

Lunsford, Andrea A., and Lisa Ede. “Collaborative Authorship and the Teaching of Writing.” Woodmansee and Jaszi. 417-38.

Lunsford, Andrea A., and Susan West. ” Intellectual Property and Composition Studies .” College Composition and Communication 47 (1996): 383-411.

Mattison, Mike. Classroom lecture, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, 23 November 1999.

Moraga, Cherríe. Loving in the War Years/Lo que nunca pasó por sus labios . Boston: South End, 1983.

Myers, Greg. “Reality, Consensus, and Reform in the Rhetoric of Composition Teaching.” College English 48 (1986): 154-74.

“Plagiarism.” Document, Department of English, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, 2002.

“Plagiarism.” Document, University of Michigan Libraries, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, 2002. Shen, Fan. “The Classroom and the Wider Culture: Identity As a Key to Learning English Composition (Staffroom Interchange).” College Composition and Communication 40 (1989): 459-66.

Spigelman, Candace. ” Habits of Mind: Historical Configurations of Textual Ownership in Peer Writing Groups .” College Composition and Communication 49 (1998): 234-55.

Stygall, Gail. “Women and Language in the Collaborative Writing Classroom.” Feminism and Composition Studies: In Other Words. Ed. Susan C. Jarratt and Lynn Worsham. New York: MLA, 1998. 252-75.

Trimbur, John. “Consensus and Difference in Collaborative Learning.” College English 51 (1989): 602-16.

Vielstimmig, Myka. “Petals on a Wet, Black Bough: Textuality, Collaboration, and the New Essay.” Passions, Pedagogies, and 21st Century Technologies. Ed. Gail E. Hawisher and Cynthia L. Selfe. Logan: Utah State UP and Urbana, IL: NCTE, 1999. 89-114.

Welch, Barbara. “A Comment on ‘Plagiarisms, Authorships, and the Academic Death Penalty.'” College English 58 (1996): 855-58.

Wilgoren, Jodi. “School Cheating Scandal Tests a Town’s Values.” New York Times 14 Feb. 2002, natl. ed.: A1+.

Wilson, Henry L. “When Collaboration Becomes Plagiarism: The Administrative Perspective.” Buranen and Roy 211-18.

Woodmansee, Martha. “On the Author Effect: Recovering Collectivity.” Woodmansee and Jaszi 15-28.

Woodmansee, Martha, and Peter Jaszi, eds. The Construction of Authorship: Textual Appropriation in Law and Literature. Durham: Duke UP, 1994.

Young, Jeffrey R. “The Cat-and-Mouse Game of Plagiarism Detection.” Chronicle of Higher Education 6 July 2001. 28 Feb. 2002 <http://chronicle.com/free/v47/i43/43a02601.htm>.

Kumamoto, Chikako D. “Bakhtin’s Others and Writing As Bearing Witness to the Eloquent ‘I.'” CCC. 54.1 (2002): 66-87.

Abstract:

Mikhail Bakhtin’s dialogism and his irenic view of the cultural other inform this article that builds the multiple voice of the eloquent “I” as a dialectic self-construction where codes of meaning are inscribed. The eloquent “I” cultivates a deepened self-dialogue and offers students an epistemological and rhetorical discipline, bearing witness to their imaginative, meaningful interiority and their written, public articulation of it.

Keywords:

ccc54.1 Self Writing Students Others MBakhtin Discourse Understanding Epistemology Community Knowledge Culture Experience

Works Cited

Bakhtin, Mikhail. Art and Answerability: Early Philosophical Essays by M. M. Bakhtin . Ed. Michael Holquist and Vadim Liapunov. Trans. and notes by Liapunov. Supplement trans. Kenneth Brostrom. Austin: U of Texas P, 1990.

—. “Author and Hero in Aesthetic Activity.” Art and Answerability 4-256.

—. “Discourse in the Novel.” The Dialogic Imagination. Ed. Michael Holquist. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: U of Texas P, 1981. 259-422.

—. “From Notes Made in 1970-71.” Speech Genres & Other Late Essays . Tran. Vern W. McGee. Ed. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: U of Texas P, 1986. 132-58.

—. “The Problem of Speech Genres.” Speech Genres 60-102.
 —. “The Problem of the Text in Linguistics, Philology, and the Human Sciences: An Experiment in Philosophical Analysis.” Speech Genres 103-31.

—. “Response to a Question from the Novy Mir Editorial Staff.” Speech Genres 1-7.
 —. “Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences.” Speech Genres 159-72.

—. Toward a Philosophy of the Act. Trans. and notes by Vadim Liapunov. Ed. by Vadim Liapunov and Michael Holquist. Austin: U of Texas P, 1993.

Berlin, James. Rhetorics, Poetics, and Cultures: Refiguring English Studies . Urbana, IL: NCTE, 1996.

Bizzell, Patricia. “What Happens When Basic Writers Come to College?” College Composition and Communication 37 (1986): 294-301.

Brummett, Barry. “Some Implications of ‘Process’ or ‘Intersubjectivity’: Postmodern Rhetoric.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 9 (1976): 21-51.

Clifford, James. “On Ethnographic Allegory.” Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography . Ed. J. Clifford and G. Marcus. Berkeley: U of California P, 1986. 98-121.

Coles, William F. The Plural I: The Teaching of Writing. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1978.

Dentith, Simon. Bakhtinian Thought: An Introductory Reader . New York: Routledge, 1995.

Dodds, Jack. Roles for Writers and Readers: A Rhetorical Anthology. New York: Macmillan, 1986.

Emerson, Caryl. The First Hundred Years of Mikhail Bakhtin . Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 1997.

Emerson, Caryli, and Michael Holquist. Introduction. Speech Genres & Other Late Essays . Tran. Vern W. McGee. Ed. Emerson and Holquist. Austin: U of Texas P, 1986. ix-xxiii.

Faigley, Lester. “Judging Writing, Judging Selves.” College Composition and Communication 40.4 (Dec. 1989): 394-412.

Fox, Helen. Listening to the World: Cultural Issues in Academic Writing . Urbana, IL: NCTE, 1994.

Geertz, Clifford. “Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture.” The Interpretation of Culture. Ed. Geertz. London: Hutchenson, 1975. 3-30.

Greenblatt, Stephen. Renaissance Self- Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare . Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1980.

Halasek, Kay. A Pedagogy of Possibility: Bakhtinian Perspectives on Composition Studies. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1999.

Harris, Joseph. “The Plural Text/The Plural Self: Roland Barthes and William Coles.” College English 49.2 (Feb. 1987): 158-70.

Hawthorne, Nathaniel. The Scarlet Letter: A Romance. Introduction by Nina Baym. Notes by Thomas E. Connolly. New York: Penguin, 1983.

Holquist, Michael, and Vadim Liapunov. Introduction. Art and Answerability: Early Philosophical Essays by M. M. Bakhtin . By M. M. Bakhtin. Ed. Holquist and Liapunov. Trans. and notes by Liapunov. Supplement trans. Kenneth Brostrom. Austin: U of Texas P, 1990. ix-xlix.

Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature Book 1. Ed. D. G. C. McNabb. Glasgow: Fontana Collins, 1962.

Keller, Evelyn Fox. “The Gender/Science System: Or, Is Sex to Gender As Nature Is to Science?” Hypatia 2.3: 37-49.

Kent, Thomas. “On the Very Idea of a Discourse Community.” College Composition and Communication 42.4 (Dec. 1991): 425-45.

Kinneavy, James. A Theory of Discourse. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1971. Knoeller, Christian. Voicing Ourselves: Whose Words We Use When We Talk about Books . Albany: State U of New York P, 1998.

Morris, Pam, ed. The Bakhtin Reader: Selected Writings of Bakhtin, Medvedev, and Voloshinov . Glossary by Graham Roberts. Auckland: Arnold, 1994.

Murray, Donald. “All Writing Is Autobiography.” College Composition and Communication 42.1 (Feb. 1991): 66-74.

Newkirk, Thomas. The Performance of Self in Student Writing . Portsmouth, NH: Boyton/Cook (Heinemann), 1997.

Newman, John Henry. The Idea of the University. Ed. Frank M. Turner. New Haven: Yale UP, 1996.

Qualley, Donna J. “Being Two Places at Once: Feminism and the Development of ‘Both/And’ Perspectives.” Pedagogy in the Age of Politics: Writing and Reading (in) the Academy . Ed. Patricia A. Sullivan and Donna J. Qualley. Urbana, IL: NCTE, 1994. 25-42.

—. Turns of Thoughts: Teaching Composition As Reflexive Inquiry . Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook (Heinemann), 1997.

Rodriguez, Richard. Hunger of Memory. Boston: David Godine, 1981.

Said, Edward W. “Identity, Authority, and Freedom: The Potentate and the Traveler.” Boundary 2 21.3 (Fall 1994): 1-18.

Sartre, Jean-Paul. “The Purpose of Writing.” Between Existentialism and Marxism . Trans. John Mathews. New York: Pantheon Books, 1974.

Spariosu, Mihai I. The Wreath of Wild Olive: Play, Liminality, and the Study of Literature . New York: SUNY P, 1997.

Todorov, Tzvetan. Mikhail Bakhtin: The Dialogical Principle . Trans. Wlad Godzich. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1984.

—. Nous et les autres: La reflexion francaise sur la diversite humanine . Paris: Editions du Seuil, 1989.

Urban, Greg. “The ‘I’ of Discourse.” Semiotics, Self, and Society . Ed. Benjamin Lee and Greg Urban. Berlin: Monton du Gruyter, 1991. 27-51.

Webber, Joan. The Eloquent “I”: Style and Self in Seventeenth-Century Prose . Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1968.

Weiss, Timothy. On the Margins: The Art of Exile in V.S. Naipaul . Amherst: U of Massachusetts P, 1992.

Yancey, Kathleen Blake. Reflection in the Writing Classroom . Logan: Utah State UP, 1998.

Cushman, Ellen. “Sustainable Service Learning Programs.” CCC. 54.1 (2002): 40-65.

Abstract:

The role of the professor in community service writing courses factors into the teaching, research, and overall institutional viability of these initiatives, yet too little has been written about the role of the professor in service learning. Through an analysis of recent publications on service learning and data gathered during an outreach initiative at University of California, Berkeley, this article reveals a few of the obstacles that hinder the sustainability of community literacy programs. I find that professors in service learning courses can better sustain these initiatives when they view the community site as a place where their research, teaching, and service contribute to a community’s self-defined needs and students’ learning.

Keywords:

ccc54.1 ServiceLearning Students Community Research Writing Faculty Program Courses Literacy

Works Cited

Addison, Joanne. “Data Analysis and Subject Representation in Empowering Composition Research.” Written Communication 14 (1997): 106-28.

Adler-Kassner, Linda, Robert Crooks, and Ann Watters, eds. Writing the Community: Concepts and Models for Service Learning in Composition . Urbana, IL: NCTE, 1997.

Anson, Chris. “On Reflection: The Role of Logs and Journals in Service-Learning Courses.” Adler-Kassner et al. 167-80.

Bacon, Nora. “Community Service Writing: Problems, Challenges, Questions.” Adler- Kassner et al. 39-56.

Brack, Gay, and Leanna Hall. “Combining the Classroom and the Community: Service Learning in Composition at Arizona State University.” Adler-Kassner et al. 143-53.

Carrick, Tracy Hamler, Margaret Himley, and Tobi Jacobi. “Ruptura: Acknowledging the Lost Subjects of the Service Learning Story.” Language and Learning across the Disciplines 4.3 (Oct. 2000): 56-75.

Charney, Davida. “Empiricism Is Not a Four-Letter Word.” College Composition and Communication 47 (1996): 567-93.

Cushman, Ellen. “Beyond Specialization: The Public Intellectual, Outreach, and Rhetoric Education.” Rhetoric Education in the Twenty-First Century University . Ed. Joseph Petraglia. Albany: SUNY. In press.

—. “The Public Intellectual, Activist Research, and Service-Learning.” College English 61.1 (1999): 68-76.

—. The Struggle and The Tools: Oral and Literate Strategies in an Inner City Community. Albany: SUNY Press, 1998.

Cushman, Ellen, and Chalon Emmons. “Contact Zones Made Real.” School’s Out: Literacy in the Community and Workplace. Ed. Glynda Hull and Katherine Shultz. New York: Teachers College, 2002. 203-31.

Cushman, Ellen, and Terese Guinsatao Monberg. “Building Bridges: Reflexivity and Composition Research.” Under Construction: Composition Research, Theory, and Practice . Ed. Chris Anson and Christine Farris. Logan: Utah State UP, 1998. 166-80.

—. “Service Learning As the New English Studies.” English Inc.: English Studies in the 21st Century . Ed. David B. Downing, C. Mark Hurlbert, and Paula Mathieu. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 2002. 204-18.

Deans, Tom. Writing Partnerships: Service Learning in Rhetoric and Composition. Urbana, IL: NCTE, 2000.

Delpit, Lisa. Other People’s Children: Cultural Conflict in the Classroom . New York: The New Press, 1995.

Dorman, Wade, and Susann Fox Dorman. “Service Learning: Bridging the Gap between the Real World and the Composition Classroom.” Adler-Kassner et al. 119-32.

Flower, Linda. “Partners in Inquiry: A Logic for Community Outreach” Adler-Kassner et al. 95-118.

Flower, Linda, and Shirley Brice Heath. “Drawing on the Local: Collaboration and Community Expertise.” Language and Learning across the Disciplines 4.3 (Oct 2000): 43-55.

Flower, Linda, Eleanor Long, and Lorraine Higgins. Learning to Rival: A Literate Practice for Intercultural Inquiry. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2000.

Geisler, Cheryl. Academic Literacy and the Nature of Expertise: Reading, Writing, and Knowing in Academic Philosophy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1994.

Grabill, Jeffrey. CW2001 Presentation. 22 Jan. 2002. “Community Computing and Citizen Productivity.” 24 Jan. 2002 <http://www.gsu.edu/~engjtg/msu/start.htm>.

—. Community Literacy Programs and the Politics of Change . Albany, NY: SUNY UP, 2001.

Goldblatt, Eli. “Who Serves Whom? Institutional Commitments in Community- Based Learning?” Conference on College Composition and Communication. Chicago, IL, 22 Mar. 2002.

Haas, Christine. Writing Technology: Studies on the Materiality of Literacy . Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996.

Harris, Joseph. “Review: Writing Partnerships: Service Learning in Composition.” Reflections on Community-Based Writing 2.1 (Fall 2001): 15-18.

Harste, Jerome, Virginia Woodward, and Carolyn Burke. “Rethinking Development and Organization.” Perspectives on Literacy. Ed. Eugene Kintgen, Barry Kroll, and Mike Rose. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1988. 321-47.

Heilker, Paul. “Rhetoric Made Real: Civic Discourse beyond the Curriculum.” Adler-Kassner et al. 71-78.

Herzberg, Bruce. “Community Service and Critical Teaching.” College Composition and Communication 45.3 (1994): 307-19.

Hessler, Brooke. “Composing an Institutional Identity.” Language and Learning across the Disciplines 4.3 (Oct. 2000): 27-42.

Higgins, Lorraine. “A Rhetoric of Inclusion: Problem Narratives That Make a Difference.” Conference on College Composition and Communication. Chicago, IL, 22 Mar. 2002.

Hull, Glynda, and Jessica Zacher. “Literate Identities, Life Paths, and the Knowledge Economy.” Conference on College Composition and Communication. Chicago, IL, 22 Mar. 2002.

Julier, Laura. “Community-Service Pedagogy.” A Guide to Composition Pedagogies. Ed. Gary Tate, Amy Rupiper, and Kurt Schick. New York: Oxford UP, 2001. 132-48.

Kintgen, Eugene, Barry Kroll, and Mike Rose, eds. Perspectives on Literacy . Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1988.

Mortensen, Peter, and Gesa Kirsch, eds. Ethics and Representation in Qualitative Research. Urbana, IL: NCTE, 1996.

Parks, Steve, and Eli Goldblatt. “Writing beyond the Curriculum: Fostering New Collaborations in Literacy.” College English 62.5 (May 2000): 584-606.

Peck, Wayne Campbell, Linda Flower, and Lorraine Higgins. ” Community Literacy .” College Composition and Communication 46.2 (1995): 199-222.

Prior, Paul. Writing/Disciplinarity. Mahweh, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1998.

Redd, Teresa. “Assessing Impact As Students, Teachers, and Clients See It.” Conference on College Composition and Communication. Chicago, IL, 22 Mar. 2002.

Schutz, Aaron, and Anne Ruggles Gere. “Service Learning and English Studies: Rethinking Public Service.” College English 60.2 (Feb. 1998): 129-49.

Sullivan, Patricia, and James Porter. Opening Spaces: Writing Technologies and Critical Research Practices. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1997.

Underwood, Charles, Mara Welsh, Mary Gauvain, and Sharon Duffy. “Learning at the Edges: Challenges to the Sustainability of Service Learning in Higher Education.” Language and Learning across the Disciplines 4.3 (Oct. 2000): 7-27.

George, Diana. “From Analysis to Design: Visual Communication in the Teaching of Writing.” CCC. 54.1 (2002): 11-39.

Abstract:

In an attempt to bring composition studies into a more thoroughgoing discussion of the place of visual literacy in the writing classroom, I argue that throughout the history of writing instruction in this country the terms of debate typical in discussions of visual literacy and the teaching of writing have limited the kinds of assignments we might imagine for composition.

Keywords:

ccc54.1 Writing Students Composition Argument Communication Design Literacy Media Images Television VisualRhetoric Analysis

Works Cited

Bartholomae, David, and Anthony Petrosky. Ways of Reading . Boston: St. Martin’s, 1987. Berger, John. Ways of Seeing. London: BBC and Penguin, 1977.

Bernhardt, Stephen. “Seeing the Text.” College Composition and Communication 37 (1986): 66-78.

Blair, J. Anthony. “The Possibility and Actuality of Visual Arguments.” Argumentation and Advocacy 33 (1996): 23-39.

Boutwell, William D., ed. Using Mass Media in the Schools . New York: Appleton- Century-Crofts, 1962.

Buchanan, Richard. “Declaration by Design: Rhetoric, Argument, and Demonstration in Design Practice.” Design Discourse: History, Theory, Criticism . Ed. Victor Margolin. Chicago: Chicago UP, 1989. 91-109.

Burnett, Esther, and Sandra Thomason. “The Cassette-Slide Show in Required Composition.” College Composition and Communication 25 (1974): 426-30.

Connors, Robert J. Composition-Rhetoric: Backgrounds, Theory, and Pedagogy . Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh UP, 1997.

Cope, Bill, and Mary Kalantzis. Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures . London: Routledge, 2000.

—. “Designs for Social Futures.” Cope and Kalantzis 203-34.

Costanzo, William. “Film As Composition.” College Composition and Communication 37 (1986): 79-86.

Faigley, Lester. “Material Literacy and Visual Design.” Rhetorical Bodies: Toward a Material Rhetoric . Ed. Jack Selzer and Sharon Crowley. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1999. 171-201.

Flesch, Rudolf. The Art of Readable Writing. New York: Harper, 1949.

Frank, Joseph. You. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. 1972.

Gardiner, John Hays, George Lyman Kittredge, and Sarah Louise Arnold. The Mother Tongue: Elements of English Composition, Book III. Boston: Ginn & Company, 1902.

George, Diana, and Diane Shoos. “Dropping Breadcrumbs in the Intertextual Forest: or, We Should Have Brought a Compass.” Ed. Gail Hawisher and Cynthia Selfe, Passions, Pedagogies, and Twentieth-First Century Technologies . Logan: Utah State UP, 1999. 115-26.

George, Diana, and John Trimbur. ” The Communication Battle, or, Whatever Happened to the Fourth C? ” College Composition and Communication 50 (1999): 682-98.

—. Reading Culture: Contexts for Critical Reading and Writing , 4th ed. New York: Longman, 2001.

Gibson, Walker. Seeing and Writing. 2nd ed. New York: D. McKay Co., 1974.

Hagstrum, Jean H. The Sister Arts: The Tradition of Literary Pictorialism and English Poetry from Dryden to Gray . Chicago: Chicago UP, 1958.

Hochschild, Adam. King Leopold’s Ghost. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1998.

Kehl, D. G. “The Electric Carrot: The Rhetoric of Advertisement” College Composition and Communication 26 (1975): 134-40.

Kellogg, Brainerd. A Text-Book on Rhetoric Supplementing the Development of the Science with Exhaustive Practice in Composition . New York: Effingham Maynard, 1891.

Kismaric, Carole, and Marvin Heiferman. Growing Up with Dick and Jane . San Francisco: Collins, 1996.

Kligerman, Jack. “Photography, Perception, and Composition,” College Composition and Communication 28 (1977): 174-78.

Kress, Gunther. “Design and Transformation: New Theories of Meaning.” Cope and Kalantzis 153-61.

—. “Multimodality.” Cope and Kalantzis 182-202.

Leonard, Harris K. “The Classics: Alive and Well with Superman,” College English 37 (1975): 405-07.

McCrimmon, James. Writing with a Purpose. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1950.

McCrimmon, James, Joseph F. Trimmer, and Nancy Sommers. Writing with a Purpose . 8th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1984.

McQuade, Donald, and Christine McQuade. Seeing & Writing. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2000.

Meyers, Lewis. Seeing Writing. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1980.

Mitchell, W. J. T. Picture Theory. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1994.

New London Group. “A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures.” Harvard Educational Review 66 (1996): 60-92.

Postman, Neil. Amusing Ourselves to Death. New York: Penguin, 1985.

—. Television and the Teaching of English. New York: Appleton-Century- Crofts, Inc., 1961.

Schultz, Lucille M. ” Elaborating Our History: A Look at Mid-19th Century First Books of Composition .” College Composition and Communication 45 (1994): 10-30.

Trimbur, John. The Call to Write. New York: Longman, 1999.

—. “Composition and the Circulation of Writing.” College Composition and Communication 52 (2000): 188-219.

—. “Delivering the Message: Typography and the Materiality of Writing.” Composition As Intellectual Work. Ed. Gary Olson. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 2002. 188-202.

—.  “Review of Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures .” College Composition and Communication 52 (2001): 659-62.

Willens, Anita. “TV: Lick It or Join It?” Boutwell, 254-56.

Wysocki, Anne Frances. “Monitoring Order: Visual Desire, the Organization of Web Pages, and Teaching the Rules of Design.” Kairos 3.2 (Fall 1998). 12 Jun. 2002 <http://www.hu.mtu.edu/~awysocki>.

Wysocki, Anne Frances, and Johndan Johnson-Eilola. “Blinded by the Letter: Why Are We Using Literacy As a Metaphor for Everything Else?” Passions, Pedagogies, and Twenty-First Century Technologies . Ed. Gail Haiwisher and Cynthia Selfe. Utah State UP, 1999. 349-68.