Conference on College Composition and Communication, November 2007
[Submitted by the CCCC Multiple Uses of Writing Task Force and adopted by the CCCC Executive Committee on November 19, 2007.]
Two recent movements in American education are working to pull the teaching and learning of writing in contradictory directions. On the one hand, a new and critical emphasis on the liberal education of citizens for the 21st century aims to help us better respond to the size, speed, and global interconnectedness of changes in economics, science and technology, politics, environmental issues, and a host of cross-cultural concerns (Association of American Colleges and Universities). On the other hand, the rise of standards-based education in the United States, especially following the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, works to compress curricula and learning into narrow indicators of teacher accountability and student achievement. At the same time writing instruction is being called upon to multiply its vision and expand student abilities, to move outward from its traditional emphasis on academic contexts and forms to include public, cross-cultural, professional, personal, and artistic contexts and forms, it is also under increasing pressure to employ high-stakes assessment procedures which research shows encourage an over-emphasis on correctness, formulaic writing, unoriginal thought, and test-driven teaching (Armein & Berliner; Hillocks).
To restrict students’ engagement with writing to only academic contexts and forms is to risk narrowing what we as a nation can remember, understand, and create. As the world grows smaller, we will live by words as never before, and it will take many words framed in many ways to transform that closeness into the mutuality needed to pursue peace and prosperity for our generation and those to come. Bearing all this in mind, the Conference on College Composition and Communication affirms that many genres and uses of writing must be taught well in the nation’s schools, colleges, and universities:
- forms of academic discourse that document with integrity what is known, while recording principled inquiry into the unknown, including analyses, reports, exploratory essays, essay exams, case studies, summaries, abstracts, and annotations;
- forms of workplace discourse that observe established conventions, though never at the expense of failing to convey ideas that enlighten and compel, including memos, proposals, evaluations, oral presentations, lab and progress reports, letters, reviews, instructions, and user manuals;
- forms of civic discourse that energize all manner of inclusive deliberation, the ideal product of which is just relations among the citizenry, broadly conceived, including arguments, commentaries, charters and manifestoes, surveys, debates, petitions, and editorials;
- forms of personal discourse that create and maintain relationships, including a relationship with one’s self, as a means to social and emotional well-being, including journals, personal narratives, memoirs, reflections, meditations, conversations, dialogues, and correspondence, all in various media;
- forms of cross-cultural discourse that bridge the divides among speakers of various Englishes as well as speakers of other languages, especially collaborative, visual, and internet-based projects, including websites, wikis, blogs, newsletters, interviews, and profiles.
- forms of aesthetic discourse that encourage the individual imagination to engage with diverse cultural traditions, including poetry, fiction, creative nonfiction, drama, screenplays, and songwriting.
The CCCC hereby calls together—and calls to action—all those who share its vision of a future in which an expansive writing curriculum, backed by ample resources, attends unyieldingly to the difficult work of helping students use good words, images, and other appropriate means, well composed, to build a better world.
Alexander, Jonathan. Digital Youth: Emerging Literacies on the World Wide Web. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2006.
Alexander, Jonathan, and Marcia Dickson, eds. Role Play: Distance Learning and the Teaching of Writing. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2006.
Association of American Colleges and Universities. College Learning for the New Global Century. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities, 2007.
Amrein, Audrey L., and David C. Berliner. “High-Stakes Testing, Uncertainty, and Student Learning.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 10.18 (2002). Retrieved 5 March 2007 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaaa/v10n18/.
Banks, Adam J. Race, Rhetoric, and Technology: Searching for Higher Ground. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2006.
Barber, John F., and Dene Grigar, eds. New Words, New Words: Exploring Pathways for Writing about and in Electronic Environments. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2001.
Belcher, Diane, and George Braine, eds. Academic Writing in a Second Language: Essays on Research and Pedagogy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1995.
Boyd, Fenice B., and Cynthia H. Brock, and Mary S. Rozendal, eds. Multicultural and Multilingual Literacy and Language: Contexts and Practices. New York: Guilford Press, 2004.
Casanave, Christine Pearson. Writing Games: Multicultural Case Studies of Academic Literacy Practices in Higher Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002.
Dias, Patrick, et al. Worlds Apart: Acting and Writing in Academic and Workplace Contexts. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1999.
Elliott, Norbert. On a Scale: A Social History of Writing Assessment in America. New York: Peter Lang, 2005.
Fox, Helen. Listening to the World: Cultural Issues in Academic Writing. Urbana, IL: NCTE, 1994.
Fredericksen, Elaine Freedman. A New World of Writers: Teaching Writing in a Diverse Society. New York: Peter Lang, 2003.
Geisler, Cheryl. “The IText Revolution.” Introduction to the Special Issue. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 18 (2004): 267-269.
Glenn, Cheryl, Margaret M. Lyday, and Wendy B. Sharer, eds. Rhetorical Education in America. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2004.
Harrington, Susanmarie, Rebecca Rickly, and Michael Day, eds. The Online Writing Classroom. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2000.
Hawisher, Gail E., and Cynthia L. Selfe, eds. Passions, Pedagogies, and 21st Century Technologies. Logan, UT: Utah State UP, 1999.
Henry, Jim. Writing Workplace Cultures: An Archaeology of Professional Writing. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois UP, 2000.
Hillocks, George, Jr. The Testing Trap: How State Writing Assessments Control Learning. New York: Teachers College Press, 2002.
Holdstein, Deborah H., and David Bleich, eds. Personal Effects: The Social Character of Scholarly Writing. Logan, UT: Utah State UP, 2001.
Huot, Brian. (Re) Articulating Writing Assessment for Teaching and Learning. Logan, UT: Utah State UP, 2002.
Isaacs, Emily J., and Phoebe Jackson, eds. Public Works: Student Writing as Public Text. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook, 2001.
Jung, Julie. Revisionary Rhetoric, Feminist Pedagogy, and Multigenre Texts. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois UP, 2005.
Kamler, Barbara. Relocating the Personal: A Critical Writing Pedagogy. Albany: SUNY Press, 2001.
Kinneavy, James L. A Theory of Discourse. New York: W.W. Norton, 1971.
Nash, Robert J. Liberating Scholarly Writing: The Power of Personal Narrative. New York: Teachers College Press, 2004.
Richards, Janet C., and Sharon K. Miller. Doing Academic Writing in Education: Connecting the Personal and the Professional. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2005.
Schroeder, Christopher, Helen Fox, and Patricia Bizzell. Alt Dis: Alternative Discourses and the Academy. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Heinemann, 2002.
Selfe, Cynthia L. Technology and Literacy in the Twenty-First Century: The Importance of Paying Attention. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois UP, 1999.
Severino, Carol, Juan C. Guerra, and Johnella E. Butler, eds. Writing in Multicultural Settings. New York: MLA, 1997.
Surma, Anne. Public and Professional Writing: Ethics, Imagination and Rhetoric. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
Thaiss, Christopher, and Terry Myers Zawacki. Engaged Writers and Dynamic Disciplines: Research on the Academic Writing Life. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Heinemann, 2006.
Weisser, Christian R. Moving Beyond Academic Discourse: Composition Studies and the Public Sphere. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois UP, 2002.
Yagelski, Robert P. Literacy Matters: Writing and Reading the Social Self. New York: Teachers College Press, 2000.
Yancey, Kathleen Blake. Delivering College Composition: The Fifth Canon. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook, 2006.
Zamel, Vivian, and Ruth Spack. Crossing the Curriculum: Multilingual Learners in College Classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2004.